<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
  <resource>
  <id>6531</id>
  <path>/www/nrich/html/content/id/6531/</path>
  <resourceTypeID>1</resourceTypeID>
  <last_published>2011-06-14T10:00:47</last_published>
  <indexXML>&lt;mdoxml version=&quot;1.0&quot;&gt;
  &lt;ul id=&quot;buttonBar&quot;&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;a href=&quot;http://nrich.maths.org/6341&amp;amp;part=&quot;&gt;Warm-up problem&lt;/a&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;a href=&quot;http://nrich.maths.org/6332&amp;amp;part=&quot;&gt;Try this next&lt;/a&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;a href=&quot;https://nrich.maths.org/discus/messages/27/27.html?1274115048&quot;&gt;Ask NRICH&lt;/a&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;a href=&quot;http://nrich.maths.org/6023&amp;amp;part=&quot;&gt;Read all about it&lt;/a&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;a href=&quot;http://nrich.maths.org/6094&quot;&gt;Last week's problem&lt;/a&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;/ul&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
Lewis Carrol thought that (in Through the looking glass, and what Alice found there)&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves Did gyre and gimble in the wabe'&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
I disagree entirely. Construct the negation of this sentence to represent my view.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Did you know... ?&lt;/span&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
Lewis Carrol was a mathematician who delighted in logical games and wordplay. His books are full of the sorts of sentences which often amuse those with a good understanding of logic.&amp;#160;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/mdoxml&gt;
</indexXML>
  <solutionXML>&lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;
&lt;mdoxml version=&quot;1.0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;1&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#FFFFCC&quot; bordercolor=&quot;#999999&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot; width=&quot;125&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nrich.maths.org/6341&amp;amp;part=&quot;&gt;Warm-up problem&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#FFCCFF&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot; width=&quot;125&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nrich.maths.org/6332&amp;amp;part=&quot;&gt;Try this next&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#33FF99&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot; width=&quot;125&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://nrich.maths.org/discus/messages/27/27.html?1274115048&quot;&gt;Ask NRICH&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#CCCCCC&quot; bordercolor=&quot;#999999&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot; width=&quot;125&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nrich.maths.org/6023&amp;amp;part=&quot;&gt;Read all about it&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#0099FF&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot; width=&quot;125&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nrich.maths.org/6094/solution&quot;&gt;Last week&amp;#39;s solution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;dfg&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;5&quot; style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
For this statement, we need not understand what a &amp;#39;tove&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;wabe&amp;#39; is, but we do need to understand the conjunctions (twas, and, in) and how negation affects them. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
 &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
We use De Morgan&amp;#39;s Law, which says that for two statements A and B $$ \lnot(A\cap B) = \lnot(A) \cup \lnot(B) $$&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
So let us denote A as &quot;it was great&quot;, and B as &quot;the slithy toves Did gyre and gimble in the wabe&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
We then see that $\lnot A$ is the statement &quot;it was not great&quot;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
And $\lnot B$ is the statement &quot;at least one slithy tove did not gyre and gimble in the wabe&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
 &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
Combining these together, we find that:&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
&quot;Either it was not great, or at least one slithy tove did not gyre and gimble in the wabe&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
 &lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;5&quot; style=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;600&quot;&gt;sdf&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;sdf&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/mdoxml&gt;</solutionXML>
  <noteXML/>
  <clueXML/>
  <canonXML>&lt;?xml version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot;?&gt;
&lt;mdoxml version=&quot;1.0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
  

&lt;table border=&quot;0&quot; padding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td width=&quot;125&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#ffffcc&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot; bordercolor=&quot;#999999&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nrich.maths.org/6341&amp;amp;part=&quot;&gt;Warm-up
problem&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td width=&quot;125&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#ffccff&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nrich.maths.org/6332&amp;amp;part=&quot;&gt;Try this next&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td width=&quot;125&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#33ff99&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://nrich.maths.org/discus/messages/27/27.html?1274115048&quot;&gt;
Ask NRICH&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td width=&quot;125&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#cccccc&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot; bordercolor=&quot;#999999&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nrich.maths.org/6023&amp;amp;part=&quot;&gt;Read all about
it&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td width=&quot;125&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#0099ff&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nrich.maths.org/6094&amp;amp;part=soln&quot;&gt;Last week's
solution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt; &lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;

&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;5&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
For this statement, we need not understand what a 'tove' or 'wabe'
is, but we do need to understand the conjunctions (twas, and, in)
and how negation affects them. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
 &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
We use De Morgan's Law, which says that for two statements A
and B $$ \lnot(A\cap B) = \lnot(A) \cup \lnot(B) $$&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
So let us denote A as &amp;quot;it was great&amp;quot;, and B as &amp;quot;the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe&amp;quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
We then see that $\lnot A$ is the statement &amp;quot;it was not
great&amp;quot;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
And $\lnot B$ is the statement &amp;quot;at least one
slithy tove did not gyre and gimble in the wabe&amp;quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
 &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
Combining these together, we find that:&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
&amp;quot;Either it was not great, or at least one slithy tove did not gyre
and gimble in the wabe&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;

&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td width=&quot;600&quot; colspan=&quot;5&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt; &lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/mdoxml&gt;</canonXML>
  <end_user_role>2</end_user_role>
  <difficulty>3</difficulty>
  <keystage1>0</keystage1>
  <keystage2>0</keystage2>
  <keystage3>0</keystage3>
  <keystage4>0</keystage4>
  <keystage4plus>1</keystage4plus>
  <title>Weekly Challenge 46: The Jabber-Notty</title>
  <description>
Can you invert this confusing sentence from Lewis Carrol?

</description>
  <spec_group>Collections
    <specifier>Weekly Challenge</specifier>
  </spec_group>
  <spec_group>Decision Mathematics and Combinatorics
    <specifier>Logic</specifier>
  </spec_group>
</resource>